Re: Ursa Major (modules in buildroot) enablement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fabio Valentini wrote:
> I have to say, making core, non-leaf packages available as modules
> only sounds like a *terrible* idea to me.
> I don't want to have to deal with this uncooked mess if I just want to
> do standard packaging.

+1. And, for that matter, that goes even for standard USING, as you implied 
in the previous paragraph:

> Because I don't even have the "-modular" repositories enabled on my
> f29 system, and I'll keep it that way.

As you explained pretty well, it does not make sense to FORCE modules onto 
users. Even less so if those packages are dependencies of other packages 
outside of the module walled garden. Ursa Major is a crude hack to make that 
broken setup work.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux