Re: Ursa Major (modules in buildroot) enablement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Nicolas Mailhot:

> My current understanding of modules benefits is that they’re just
> improved SCLs. ie something EL oriented that the average Fedora packager
> has little interest or use for.
>
> Practically, being improved SCLs just means:
>
> 1. rawhide has the latest version of each module enabled by default,
> 2. stable has the same version enabled by default if the module version
> is completely baked, and the previous one otherwise
> 3. epel has the same module version as stable enabled by default

Modules do not support parallel installations of different module
versions.  Many SCLs are constructed in such a way that this is
possible.  So I'm not sure if modules are a clear improvement over SCLs.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux