On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 19:46 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: >On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 14:15 -0500, seth vidal wrote: >>So maybe I'm confused here. Maybe I'm lost, but what the hell do you >>think I'm doing? > >Mostly being a muppet, since you ask. A muppet? wow. Jim Henson's intellectual property aside, who do you think is doing the controlling? Got a good theory for me? >>But everytime someone brings up something on this list that is going to >>change the response is: >>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO IT CANNOT CHANGE. CHANGE IS BAD. DON'T CHANGE >>THINGS. > >That's a very disingenuous misstatement of what people have asked for. A >more honest summary would be: > >"Don't make this change so hastily -- since we can do this properly in >FC5, please let's do it then, when Extras is workable". That's a very disingenuous statement too. I think extras is workable now. If it's not I wonder what I've been building every night for the past N weeks. -sv
