On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 11:25 -0500, seth vidal wrote: >anaconda can so handle dependencies >it just doesn't currently have a way to talk to those repositories that >have the dependencies. ....so it can't handle them. Seth, you seem to be deliberately muddying the issue, just as with the red herring 'closed source' thing. I chose acroread 7 as an example of a package with dependencies on a library which is absent from a later version of Core. Whether you can get the source or not is entirely irrelevant. Getting back to the point you were deviating from -- apparently the intention is that anaconda _will_ be able to handle such out-of-Core dependencies in FC5, which is why so many people are suggesting that the package-killing spree be postponed until FC5. -- dwmw2
