> Getting back to the point you were deviating from -- apparently the > intention is that anaconda _will_ be able to handle such out-of-Core > dependencies in FC5, which is why so many people are suggesting that the > package-killing spree be postponed until FC5. and I'm explaining that the 'package killing spree' as you so colorfully have put it, is not anything new. it's happened in EVERY RELEASE. It just wasn't discussed. which leads me to believe that, due to the reaction this time around, it won't be discussed in the future. It'll just happen. -sv
