On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 5:03 PM Björn Persson <Bjorn@rombobjörn.se> wrote: > > Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still > > converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package. > > Maybe I'll try that next time I have some free time. This is giving me > a "best viewed with Netscape Navigator" feeling though. Not only are > there several different badly designed document authoring languages, > but they're apparently even splitting into tool-specific dialects. > I'm wondering if it was a good idea to use asciidoc in the first place. Unlike reStructuredText, asciidoc implementations seem to be in very poor shape. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
