Re: Fedora Packaging Guidelines on docs.fedoraproject.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 11:02:13PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> > Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
> > converts quickly.  It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
> Maybe I'll try that next time I have some free time. This is giving me
> a "best viewed with Netscape Navigator" feeling though. Not only are
> there several different badly designed document authoring languages,
> but they're apparently even splitting into tool-specific dialects.

That's not really the case here. See https://github.com/asciidoc/asciidoc;
asciidoctor is officially the blessed successor to asciidoc.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux