Re: Improving the glibc32 situation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



El vie, 09-03-2018 a las 14:55 +0100, Florian Weimer escribió:
> On 03/09/2018 02:52 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> 
> > Stepping back a bit, I'm curious why glibc32 would land in the
> > composes.  It shouldn't...  it should only be tagged in the fNN-
> > build
> > tags, which the composes should not pull from.  Where do we have
> > recent issues of it getting pulled into a compose?
> 
> It happens after every single mass rebuild.  The package is rebuilt
> and 
> tagged, and then *boom*.
> 
> Thanks,
> Florian

I think we can resolve this by adding glibc32 to the mass rebuild
blacklist. then it will not be rebuilt.  the sources for it is
precompiled binaries so rebuilding does nothing

Dennis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux