Re: Improving the glibc32 situation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/09/2018 02:52 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:

Stepping back a bit, I'm curious why glibc32 would land in the
composes.  It shouldn't...  it should only be tagged in the fNN-build
tags, which the composes should not pull from.  Where do we have
recent issues of it getting pulled into a compose?

It happens after every single mass rebuild. The package is rebuilt and tagged, and then *boom*.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux