Re: What to I have to do....

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/08/2017 11:59 AM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Steve Dickson" <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Charalampos Stratakis"
>> <cstratak@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx>, "Yaakov Selkowitz" <yselkowi@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Friday, December 8, 2017 5:46:03 PM
>> Subject: Re: What to I have to do....
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/08/2017 11:21 AM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
>>> The kernel is actually blacklisted from proven packager access, you can't
>>> make changes there.
>> This is good to know... how do you get on that list? ;-)
>>>
>>> Apart from that though, I don't really see any reasons for creating this
>>> thread.
>>>
>>> Proven packagers do trivial and non-trivial cleanups all the time. While I
>>> agree that a PR would be better,
>>> when dealing with changes on a vast amount of packages that should be
>>> ideally done in a timely manner, waiting for a
>>> timely response from every single maintainer of the respective packages is
>>> just not realistic.
>> I understand the need to make massive changes... I no problem with that...
>> The problem is random people are making non-critical, non-massive
>> changes because they "feel" its the right thing to do. Those
>> changes should go through the maintainer.
>>
>> steved.
>>
> 
> You will have to realize though, that at the moment you are currently talking from your perspective and only, so basically about your "feels" on the matter.
> 
> And while certainly there might have been cases where a proven packager acted inappropriately, I don't see that particular case as such.
I agree..
> 
> A proven packager is not someone random, they were given access based on various criteria and that IMHO includes the fact that their perception or "feels"
> about what has to be done on other people's packages, is aligned with what has to be done for the overall improvement of the distribution. 
Fine... I understand your point... they have broader perspective...

But can't they ask the maintainer to act on their feeling via a pull-request?

steved. 
> 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux