Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:52:52AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> However, I don't think this means we MUST ship 57. Talking about
> 'security backports' in the abstract is all well and good, but no-one
> even seems to have stated yet that there *are* any important security
> fixes in 57. Even if there are, we *can* look at the feasibility of
> backporting them ourselves (or in co-ordination with other
> distributors, who may well be in the same position as us). It's
> something we do for many other packages, after all; it's not
> impossible.

Also we might be able to forward-port patches from the latest ESR.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux