On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 09:54:22AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > Do you think that this problem is as bad if we overload / replace / > > enhance comps groups and the @ syntax? Or do we need to find a > > different character? (Uh, I guess % is sitting out there....) > Again, if my scripts are using the @ symbol, I am expecting that I am going > to get the @ syntax. As can be seen when the comps groups get broken in a > main release, there are people who rely on it for deploying the system and > expect that certain choices are 'made'. I would go with either a new symbol > or keyword. Even if, as in my imagination, we could make modules behave as a superset of comps groups? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
