On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 22:01, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:41 PM, <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > > Then I'm glad there is absolutely no plan to preempt flatpack technical > > assessment by shipping one or more GNOME apps as flatpack-only, leaving > > Fedora users for whom flatpack does not work yet behind, and bypassing > > distribution consensus processes. > > > > This kind of action would be really divisive¹, especially while > > simultaneously seeking Fedora endorsement. [...] > > ¹ Those shortcuts rarely end well. Even when the missing bits are > > eventually added, users have a long memory of being left in the dust > > because their use-cases are deemed "wrong" or "uninteresting". > > I think this already happened. Applications like GNOME Recipes are > only available via Flatpaks. The Workstation WG did not package it for > Fedora 26. I don't know if other GNOME applications are in a similar state. :( It's not shipped as Flatpak by Fedora. Nobody's stopping you from submitting a package of Recipes for review. Or are you demanding that the Workstation WG maintain an RPM package of Recipes? Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
