On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 03:10:16PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > As Fedora stands today, of course, "the Fedora Server repo" means "all > > the stuff Fedora packages at all". > Um. Does it? I am not entirely sure if this is what was meant in > context, but there *is* a "Fedora Server repo" which does *not* contain > "all the stuff Fedora packages at all" - for instance, the repos you > can find under: I know, but as you've heard me whining about before, that's a weird artifact of the build process that leaks out onto the mirrors. Once you have a Fedora Server system up and running you're pointed at Everything. The "Server" package tree is just a red herring and confusing to users (while wasting at _least_ processing time while mirroring, if not space and network traffic where hardlinking isn't available). If we wanted to change that the other way around and make it a real thing, I'm not *necessarily* opposed, but it would definitely be a huge change in user experience. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
