On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 14:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:55:58PM -0400, langdon wrote: > > Apologies, but I was talking about "available in the Fedora Server > > repo". Specifically, we have a lofty goal that everything in that > > repo would have a module wrapped around it. We may not get there > > which triggers the choices above. > > As Fedora stands today, of course, "the Fedora Server repo" means "all > the stuff Fedora packages at all". Um. Does it? I am not entirely sure if this is what was meant in context, but there *is* a "Fedora Server repo" which does *not* contain "all the stuff Fedora packages at all" - for instance, the repos you can find under: https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/25/Server/ The contents of the Server install tree (and hence these repos) are, I believe, defined in: https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/blob/master/f/variants-fedora.xml and can easily be seen to be a subset of the entire Fedora package set. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
