On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 13:27 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 03:10:16PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > As Fedora stands today, of course, "the Fedora Server repo" means "all > > > the stuff Fedora packages at all". > > > > Um. Does it? I am not entirely sure if this is what was meant in > > context, but there *is* a "Fedora Server repo" which does *not* contain > > "all the stuff Fedora packages at all" - for instance, the repos you > > can find under: > > I know, but as you've heard me whining about before, that's a weird > artifact of the build process that leaks out onto the mirrors. Once you > have a Fedora Server system up and running you're pointed at > Everything. Well, yes, but *in context*, the text was specifying the extent of the package set it covered. It seems, to me, at least as likely that the intent of the text was "the Change will cover all the packages in the Server install tree" as "the Change will cover all the packages in the 'fedora' repository". I don't think it's necessary or appropriate to debate the nature or desirability of the Server install tree repos at this point, as the actual practical *point* under discussion here is what the text actually means in defining the scope of the Change. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
