On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 16:55 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Matthew Miller > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:06:18PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > > > > Hmmm, so, if I want some random utility (let's say gcal, which I don't > > > > package, or calc, which I do) on my server, what are my options? Can I > > > > [...] > > > The modular release is effectively a separate distro. > > > > > > While using single RPMs from traditional Fedora might work in > > > most cases, I wouldn't recommend enabling the entire repository > > > which also provides packages conflicting with (and possibly > > > updating) those provided by modules. > > > > > > Creating logical modules would be the best approach here. > > > Containers are also an option but someone needs to make them, too. > > > > So, would a "Random Command-Line Tools" module make sense? Sort of like > > the old "system-tools" comps group? That's a grab bag of stuff like > > screen, setserial, nmap, xdelta, htop, and a whole bunch more. > > How do you come to a consensus on what people believe are must > have/critical "Random Command-Line Tools" that "make sense"? I suspect > everyone will have a differing opinion there. Okay, fine, I'll start: vi! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
