Re: Fedora Modules & Fedora 27 Server Edition (Changes)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:55:42PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> Creating logical modules would be the best approach here.
> >> Containers are also an option but someone needs to make them, too.
> > So, would a "Random Command-Line Tools" module make sense? Sort of like
> > the old "system-tools" comps group? That's a grab bag of stuff like
> > screen, setserial, nmap, xdelta, htop, and a whole bunch more.
> How do you come to a consensus on what people believe are must
> have/critical "Random Command-Line Tools" that "make sense"? I suspect
> everyone will have a differing opinion there.

Absolutely; this module would contain these tools but not install them
by default.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux