On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:06:18PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: >> > Hmmm, so, if I want some random utility (let's say gcal, which I don't >> > package, or calc, which I do) on my server, what are my options? Can I > [...] >> The modular release is effectively a separate distro. >> >> While using single RPMs from traditional Fedora might work in >> most cases, I wouldn't recommend enabling the entire repository >> which also provides packages conflicting with (and possibly >> updating) those provided by modules. >> >> Creating logical modules would be the best approach here. >> Containers are also an option but someone needs to make them, too. > > So, would a "Random Command-Line Tools" module make sense? Sort of like > the old "system-tools" comps group? That's a grab bag of stuff like > screen, setserial, nmap, xdelta, htop, and a whole bunch more. How do you come to a consensus on what people believe are must have/critical "Random Command-Line Tools" that "make sense"? I suspect everyone will have a differing opinion there. Peter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
