On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 11:10:59 -0500 fche@xxxxxxxxxx (Frank Ch. Eigler) wrote: > praiskup wrote: > > > [...] > > Cool. Let's provide 'pkgconf' so we can be also three, too! But > > at the same time please consider not dropping 'pkgconfig' for no > > reason. > > ... and also let's make sure that the new package does not break > builds. For one of ours, the .spec file contained: > > BuildRequires: pkgconfig > BuildRequires: foo-devel > > Yes, this is not canonical pkgconfig(foo) & perfect & stuff, but it's > worked for years. With the new changes, it breaks builds: > [...] > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2704/17392704/root.log > > DEBUG util.py:421: Error: package > pkgconf-pkg-config-1.2.0-1.fc26.aarch64 conflicts with pkgconfig < > 1:0.29.1-2 provided by pkgconfig-1:0.29.1-1.fc25.aarch64 This will be fixed soon (today hopefully) without you needing to make any more changes. We need to get dnf updated on the aarch64/ppc64/ppc64le builders. kevin
Attachment:
pgpVhppiUZchn.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
