Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neal Gompa wrote:
> Because pkgconf supports the full specification, including Provides
> rules. pkgconfig does not. It's been *years* and they never added
> support for it. It's even documented to be a stub implementation in
> pkgconfig. As a result of pkgconf fully implementing the Provides
> rules, .pc files that actually use them will be fully and properly
> processed and generate pkgconfig() Provides properly.

Where is this specification you keep talking about, and who wrote it?
The specifications I can find are
https://people.freedesktop.org/~dbn/pkg-config-guide.html and "man 1
pkg-config". Neither of those mention a field named Provides.

Is there disagreement about what the file format is? It could be very
bad if multiple incompatible variants of .pc files would arise so that
different libraries would require different pkg-config programs.

Björn Persson

Attachment: pgpx6IG_kPPCm.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux