On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 11:10 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > praiskup wrote: > > > [...] > > Cool. Let's provide 'pkgconf' so we can be also three, too! But > > at the > > same time please consider not dropping 'pkgconfig' for no reason. > > ... and also let's make sure that the new package does not break > builds. > For one of ours, the .spec file contained: > > BuildRequires: pkgconfig > BuildRequires: foo-devel > > Yes, this is not canonical pkgconfig(foo) & perfect & stuff, but it's > worked for years. With the new changes, it breaks builds: > [...] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2704/17392704/ro > ot.log > > DEBUG util.py:421: Error: package > pkgconf-pkg-config-1.2.0-1.fc26.aarch64 conflicts with pkgconfig < > 1:0.29.1-2 provided by pkgconfig-1:0.29.1-1.fc25.aarch64 This is known issue (not really caused by pkgconf change, but it is caused by bug in dnf), see: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6597 > > > - FChE > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- -Igor Gnatenko _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
