Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



praiskup wrote:

> [...]
> Cool.  Let's provide 'pkgconf' so we can be also three, too!  But at the
> same time please consider not dropping 'pkgconfig' for no reason.

... and also let's make sure that the new package does not break builds.
For one of ours, the .spec file contained:

BuildRequires: pkgconfig
BuildRequires: foo-devel

Yes, this is not canonical pkgconfig(foo) & perfect & stuff, but it's
worked for years.  With the new changes, it breaks builds:
[...] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2704/17392704/root.log

DEBUG util.py:421:  Error: package
pkgconf-pkg-config-1.2.0-1.fc26.aarch64 conflicts with pkgconfig <
1:0.29.1-2 provided by pkgconfig-1:0.29.1-1.fc25.aarch64


- FChE
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux