Josh Boyer (jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > If that is not the case anymore it would be good if that would be > > communicated in advance so that all users on mac hw could either > > switch distros or gang together to make a remix or something. > > You are confusing Fedora with a company. There is no top-down > communication on what is or is not supported. There is no hardware > support list or hardware certification list. It is literally what > people show up and test. In the past couple of weeks we have: 1) Fedora going out to survey HN about what they want, and 'seamless hardware compatiblity' being a top response 2) This thread about how there's no institutional (for lack of a better word) project commitment to any set of supportable hardware in particular If #2 is the hard reality, there's not much point to even bothering with the effort of inventorying items from surveys like #1. If #1 is a serious effort, then that should lead to a discussion of how we fix #2... but that's a discussion for a council or "please $CORPORATE_SPONSOR, help us" list, rather than this tactical thread. I do think that, for the sake of the project, the disconnect does need to be resolved somehow. Bill _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
