Improvements of Fedora Sponsorship process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we had very interesting follow-up discussion.

We come up with several improvements, which should be easy to implement and may improve the process a lot. I am posting it here so more people can see that and join the discussion.

a) Sponsoree (who apply for package maintainer status) is required to create Copr project and maintain the package there until he get the package into Fedora. This should show his endurance to sponsors. It will improve the morale of the sponsoree as the package is immediately ready for other users. And it is not wiped after 14 days as scratch builds in Koji.

b) fedora-review is run automatically by some bot/script just after review have been submitted.

c) Create wiki page with list of sponsors willing to accept new sponsoree. And list area of expertise of sponsors (e.g. java, python, IoT...). This will make for sponsoree easier to find right sponsor. Because we have some sponsors, who are active but are not willing to accept new sponsoree right now.

d) When sponsors is not active for 2 years [*] - that means not just in sponsoring work, but there is no activity in BZ, koji, wiki and any other Fedora service at all (guessed by reading log of fedmsg), then his sponsor status is removed. We will assume that the sponsor is gone for good.

e) When the package review is still not assigned to anybody after 3 months [*], then 3 [*] random sponsors are added to CC and asked to proceed with the review despite the fact that it likely doesn't belong to their area of expertise. This should helps us to get rid of stalled review, which are waiting for ages to get some sponsor.

Those are the ideas which came up at Flock. Please comment this. And if we come to some conclusion, I can pass it to FeSCo for approval.

[1] http://miroslav.suchy.cz/presentations/flock2016/sponsors/#/

Please note that the data in this presentation is based only on data I was able to gather and I am aware the it does not reflect 100% the reality. But it approximately gives us the order of magnitude of the reality and approximately ratio.

[*] I just made up this number. Feel free to discuss appropriate interval.

--

Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux