Miroslav Suchý wrote: > I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we had > very interesting follow-up discussion. > > We come up with several improvements, which should be easy to implement > and may improve the process a lot. I am posting it here so more people > can see that and join the discussion. > > a) Sponsoree (who apply for package maintainer status) is required to > create Copr project *required*? No, strongly encouraged maybe. As an aside, Copr doesn't require CLA+1 ? (If not, isn't that just asking to be abused/spammed, like the we've seen elsewhere?) -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
