Re: Fedora development of Snap packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 01:12:07PM -0400, Ben Rosser wrote:
> ship pip, npm, etc? Where I become uncomfortable, and the reason I chimed
> in on this thread initially, is with the idea that these new containerized
> packaging systems are in some way *superior* to traditional packaging. Or
> at least that's what I read between the lines of the proposal to allow
> upstreams to ask for their flatpaks or whatever to be shipped in place of
> RPMs.

I think that once the full sandboxing / portal system is in place,
there _will_ be a tangible reason to prefer Flatpak.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux