On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 01:12:07PM -0400, Ben Rosser wrote: >> ship pip, npm, etc? Where I become uncomfortable, and the reason I chimed >> in on this thread initially, is with the idea that these new containerized >> packaging systems are in some way *superior* to traditional packaging. Or >> at least that's what I read between the lines of the proposal to allow >> upstreams to ask for their flatpaks or whatever to be shipped in place of >> RPMs. > > I think that once the full sandboxing / portal system is in place, > there _will_ be a tangible reason to prefer Flatpak. Unless we can get the same sandboxing to work for RPMs, too. I'd *love* to be able to: sudo dnf install inkscape inkscape and have it be sandboxed. If we do s/inkscape/firefox, even better. --Andy -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
