On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 02:26:27PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Isn't bugzappers officially defunct? It does seem like a reasonable > > enough policy, for whatever that's worth. > > Yeah, the group is. We can have an exciting debate about whether we > consider that to mean the bug status workflow page is no longer 'in > effect', but since it never had any enforcement mechanism or anything > it seems a tad pointless =) I just wanted to point out we did at least > formulate a policy for this at one time, and the policy isn't really > particularly tied to the Bugzappers group, it just happens to live > there. Well, it's less about "in effect" in a legal sense and more about "completely lost in the deadzone of the wiki". > There are a few other 'living pages' in the Bugzappers wiki space, > FWIW, though jkurik and I have talked a bit about moving the relevant > material somewhere else. +1 yeah this. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
