On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 07:09:53PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>Right. Tooling should stop that too. And I'm not just talking > >>_completely_ in hand-wavy theory. This is Dennis Gilmore's plan, where > >>any package build which breaks other packages (or possibly other > >>integration testing) gets automatically shuttled to a temporary side > >>repo. > >That's a good idea. > This is good idea for releases, but would be utterly counter > productive to rawhide. You'd end up with not being able or drowning > in bureaucracy e.g. to add SONAME breaking changes. Why bureaucracy? Once the packages pass, they'd be automatically all added back in. That said, the current idea is to leave Rawhide as is, and add a separate "gated" layer. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
