On 02/03/2016 12:42 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 05:26:23 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:13:13PM -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
This approach really scales badly and creates busywork.
And breaking rawhide however often due to unnoticed soname bumps
does scale well and does not cause busywork?
Right. Tooling should stop that too. And I'm not just talking
_completely_ in hand-wavy theory. This is Dennis Gilmore's plan, where
any package build which breaks other packages (or possibly other
integration testing) gets automatically shuttled to a temporary side
repo.
That's a good idea.
This is good idea for releases, but would be utterly counter productive
to rawhide. You'd end up with not being able or drowning in bureaucracy
e.g. to add SONAME breaking changes.
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
