On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 05:26:23 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:13:13PM -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > >This approach really scales badly and creates busywork. > > And breaking rawhide however often due to unnoticed soname bumps > > does scale well and does not cause busywork? > > Right. Tooling should stop that too. And I'm not just talking > _completely_ in hand-wavy theory. This is Dennis Gilmore's plan, where > any package build which breaks other packages (or possibly other > integration testing) gets automatically shuttled to a temporary side > repo. That's a good idea. Late Fedora Extras could run repoclosure on the buildsys' "needsign" queue (= packages waiting to be pushed *and* included in the buildroot immediately). Not fully automated, but the earliest opportunity to notify packagers about breakage and also the chance to withdraw such packages. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
