On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 09:08:04AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > > Right. Tooling should stop that too. And I'm not just talking > > _completely_ in hand-wavy theory. This is Dennis Gilmore's plan, where > > any package build which breaks other packages (or possibly other > > integration testing) gets automatically shuttled to a temporary side > > repo. > I think I asked this question before, but I don't remember the answer. > Will Dennis's work include some way of letting high priority packages > break low priority packages? As an example, I maintain the polymake It's a good question. :) I don't know the answer, but it does make sense to me that we have something like this. > Either way, we should let polymake break and let me fix it as soon as > I can. Perl updates should not be delayed. Will that be possible? Maybe polymake should be in its own repository with a version of perl that it's known to work with. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
