On 3.2.2016 16:34, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:57:37PM +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: >> attempt on settle this one down: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6761 > > rfc6761 is a useful reference, but it doesn't really solve this > discussion one way or another. > It's concerned with names to be "carved off a sub-tree of the DNS > namespace in which the modified name treatment rules apply", but > single label names are already special anyway. Well, all special names are specified in RFC 6761 and associated registry. What RFC says that single-label names are 'special'? In what sense 'special'? How do you differentiate arbitrary 'single-label' from TLD in DNS? Answers to these questions need backing from standards because all parties doing name resolution need to do it consistently. Petr Spacek @ Red Hat >> (also filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975856) > This is one of the problems that myhostname solves. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
