On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Am 16.01.2016 um 22:07 schrieb Neal Gompa: >> >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga >>> <luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Does Oracle include ZFS in their ISO by default? >>> >>> >>> No, and as far as I know they don't contribute to ZFS on Linux. There >>> is a distinction between ZFS and OpenZFS that's kinda important. ZFS >>> on Linux is based on OpenZFS, not ZFS. There're incompatible features >>> since pool version 28 in each, so they're essentially diverging. I >>> don't know if that qualifies them as defacto forks (either from each >>> other, or from ZFS pool version 28). Anyway, Oracle only includes ZFS >>> in Solaris. And they continue to contribute to Btrfs. >> >> >> They do, however, include DTrace in their distribution, which remains >> CDDL licensed in their distribution > > > stop that FUD - CDDL is not the problem - MIXING is the topic > and don't bring "cdrecrord" to the topic, the author is the problem > > back to topic: > even if DTrace would be closed source Oracle could include it because tehy > are the *copyright holder* and can release it under *every* license they > like to do > DTrace is a kernel module that is CDDL licensed in Oracle Linux. So, not FUD. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
