Am 14.01.2016 um 19:57 schrieb Gerald B. Cox:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxx <mailto:notting@xxxxxxxx>> wrote: As a rule, I try not to take legal licensing interpretations from a CTO who's trying to sell me the thing they're talking about the licensing of. We certainly could send that interpretation of CDDL/GPL and the kernel to the legal team... but I'm not sure they'd agree with it. Well, if Lawrence Livermore is doing it, and Canonical apparently plans to do it, it probably would be a good idea to get a determination from the legal team
who is "Lawrence Livermore"? is Canonical located in the US? no! is Redhat located in the US? yes! you see the difference? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_LicenseZFS cannot be included in the GPL-licensed Linux kernel, because it is licensed under the GPL-incompatible CDDL
PERIOD
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
