ZFS on Linux: Copyright and Licensing Issues (pdf created april 2013) This was written by a lawyer, but the disclaimer is this is a cursory evaluation, not legal advice. http://www.rtt-law.com/public/files/docs/Williams%20-%20Software%20copyrights%20white%20paper.pdf But I still predict bigger obstacles. I just don't see how it'd ever be OK to have a tainted kernel being used on installer media, and that'd have to be the case in order to get install time support, either for root fs or even as just /data or /srv storage. I'd eat my hat (and a billy goat) if any of either the kernel, QA, or installer teams were OK with this. It's too much work and risk for very little upside. So it'd be a post-install package at best no matter what, in which case what's the advantage of it being offered by Fedora rather than from the ZoL org folks? --- Chris Murphy -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
