On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 20:24 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > likely i did much more research than you can even imagine long > before > that thread started I find this challenging to believe. > CDDL is incompatible with GPLv2 - period Did you read the web site at all? The argument is that it can be used as a kernel module without constituting a derived work. Many developers believe this is not a GPL violation. Many believe otherwise. This is a well-known, open controversy. It's to be expected that different sets of lawyers will have different opinions on the risk depending on business requirements and their company's risk profile. Michael -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
