Am 14.01.2016 um 20:35 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 20:24 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:likely i did much more research than you can even imagine long before that thread startedI find this challenging to believe.
i don't care what you believe
CDDL is incompatible with GPLv2 - periodDid you read the web site at all? The argument is that it can be used as a kernel module without constituting a derived work. Many developers believe this is not a GPL violation. Many believe otherwise. This is a well-known, open controversy. It's to be expected that different sets of lawyers will have different opinions on the risk depending on business requirements and their company's risk profile.
and Redhat legal decided against now you!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
