On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:54:43PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > Frankly, I'd like to see Fedora move away from grub2 even on x86. But > > I'd > > > also like to see grubby go away. > > > > Maybe you could start by listing the problems you have with grubby > > (and apparently grub2) instead of just saying get rid of it? > > > > josh > > > My big pain point right now is that we can't have /boot be a subvolume on > btrfs and boot properly. > > GRUB2 and ExtLinux both support booting from btrfs just fine, but we don't > seem to support it for some reason? > > I can't recall the issue off the top of my head, but I *think* the issue > was related to grubby. Perhaps using grub2-mkconfig would fix this? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 It used to work, then it got broke. To spare you from reading all the comments in bug, the solution was to remove (from Anaconda) the ability to configure this specific btrfs layout. This solved release criteria compliance, but left all previously installed systems with the pants down. I've been using grub2-mkconfig after every kernel upgrade succesfully on those systems, since then. On current, UEFI systems I'm using systemd-boot. -- Tomasz Torcz RIP is irrevelant. Spoofing is futile. xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx Your routes will be aggreggated. -- Alex Yuriev -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
