Am 18.09.2015 um 16:11 schrieb Scott Schmit:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:09:47PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:Am 14.09.2015 um 21:04 schrieb Adam Williamson:But just two posts ago you were drawing a distinction between an 'OS' and a 'distribution' and saying that Fedora ought to be a distribution not an OS. So basically you're saying...Fedora should be a distribution but it shouldn't include 'userdata', and you're somehow defining Wordpress as 'userdata', on the basis that it's often deployed for multiple users.surely - you can't deploy an application (no matter what language) supposed to run hundrets of times with different configs, customazations and themes with a central package managment *anything* which is not supposed to be used that way is a completly different storyBut we do! All these: - GNOME - KDE - Firefox - Chrome/Chromium - pidgin - vim - emacs support different: - configurations - customizations - themes with central package management
you really compare them with wordpress or any other web-application which are supposed to have their configgs editable by the webspace owner?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
