Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:45:13 +0200, you wrote:

>if Fedora changes to more and more recommend "pip", "gem" and "cpan" 
>like installs instead RPM packages it is no longer a distribution over 
>the long because that would mean finally you have a core OS and handle 
>anything else like Microsoft or Apple - does anybody really want to go 
>that road?

It's not a case of whether anyone here wants to go down that road or
not, because we are already there.

There is a reason that the Atomic / CoreOS idea combined with Docker
is gaining traction, and it is because it deals with the reality of
dealing with software whose dependencies don't work in the traditional
distribution world.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux