On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 18:55:38 +0200, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
it masks the existence of a security update with broken deps and we *really* don't need another flamewar thread - it is a bad attitude to make such options the default
I think it's much more likely there is a good security update available but a broken update for some other package which would block doing the security update in the absence of the skip broken feature.
Skip broken isn't going to have that much effect on not noticing that a security update is broken. There are other tools for helping with that when the brokenness is contained within Fedora.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
