Am 07.04.2015 um 19:08 schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 18:55:38 +0200, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:it masks the existence of a security update with broken deps and we *really* don't need another flamewar thread - it is a bad attitude to make such options the defaultI think it's much more likely there is a good security update available but a broken update for some other package which would block doing the security update in the absence of the skip broken feature. Skip broken isn't going to have that much effect on not noticing that a security update is broken. There are other tools for helping with that when the brokenness is contained within Fedora
jesus chirst it *does not matter* what is more or less likelyburry errors is *wrong* in any case and there is also a world outside "within fedora" and the Fedora repos itself
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
