Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:22:25 -0300,
 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 I had also switched back to yum in rawhide due to --skip-broken, and
in a few updates not even needing it (I would first see what is broken,
and if not something "vital", use --skip-broken), while dnf would just fail
with cryptic messages. I can keep up if kde or gnome is broken, or
some other stuff that does not prevent boot and a functional system.

dnf really does need --skip-broken like support if it is to replace yum. yum can be a lot faster than the needed work around to get dnf to work equivalently. I am considering going back to yum in rawhide rather than continuig to test dnf in rawhide because of this issue.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux