On 12/09/14 01:08 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On 09/07/2014 12:24 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
However there is a wider problem here. The "systemd of Fedora 14/15"
is not the systemd of today.
I agree 100%
We need to decide if just because you manage to get an important core
package into Fedora 4 years ago, that means you can forever more push
any old stuff you want into Fedora, without going back and consulting
with the community and FESCo.
"On Qui, 2014-09-04 at 22:12 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Therefore I'd find it useful for systemd take a break and period of
consolidation to sort out the bugs and impact of systemd on Fedora. "
yeah this and Chris Adams wrote almost synthesized what I think.
what is the systemd goals ? plans ? roadmap ? seems that systemd want
to be a operating system.
You are wasting your time. Lennart and his bunch proved to be impervious
to any pleas to stop mad feature creep.
They WANT to extend systemd in every imaginable way to scratch their
favorite itch of the week. It's not a coincidence or an oversight.
That's what they like doing. Possibly, that's the MAIN motivation
behind systemd development now - to take over whatever part
of the system they want, and enjoy it.
And Fedora userbase is their hostages now. Fedora maintainers seem
to be okay with it. Fine.
In Linux, when all else fails, we can always move to a different distro.
Oh please, can we cut the drama down a notch?
--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
access to education?
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
