Once upon a time, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@xxxxxxxxx> said: > The scope of systemd has crept dramatically since the start. If the > initial discussions of systemd said it would merge dhcp, udev, and > that it would push binary logging, etc. Do you really think it would > have gone without more vigorous opposition? Yeah, I think this is my biggest annoyance with systemd. Scope creep is terrible; it almost always results in an unmanageable pile of bits that has to be (once again) reimplemented. systemd seems to continue to subsume other parts of the system that really don't seem to be related. We have a perfectly functional network stack that has seen many years of development and refinement; why reinvent yet another wheel? IMHO it is heading towards the emacs mode, where it is an operating system unto itself (if systemd ever grows an email client or a text editor, we'll know for sure it is time to knock it down and start over). -- Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
