On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 11:14:59 -0400 Digimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/09/14 11:11 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, > > [1] > > since Fedora have some responsibility, unfortunately I think the > > group have some valid reasons , systemd should be the replacement of > > sysvinit , a built in DHCP !? why ? and others integration like > > crontab should be modular, for someone else could use his own > > crontab . OTOH , the support of systemd is not good, we got bug > > opened and they are ignored as nothing happens, as for example bug > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088619 > > > > > > [1] http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTc3OTM > > > > best regards, > > This is the gift of drama that never stops giving. > > Trying to undo systemd at this point is next to impossible. All major > distributions are using it or will be moving to it, so far as I know. > Switching away at this point would be very disruptive and hurt Linux > in general far more than it would help. Do we really need another systemd thread? I'm going to suggest that boycottsystemd is offtopic for this list. We aren't going to boycott it. I wish those who want to do so the very best, but they should just get on with it and go do that and leave everyone else alone. If you think there's anything constructive to pull from them that should be fixed in systemd, please do so and file bugs with systemd upstream. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
