Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:05:31AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:

> oh, that's an impressive list, but I would like see to one more thing
> there - links to upstream bug reports where relevant (eg. fixing
> configure stuff), because we usually need them fixed in upstreams too

Yes, I missed this as well. Also IIRC the guidelines demand an patch
status comment for each patch in the spec file, so just adding patch
without noting why it is not upstreamable or information about when/how
it was upstreamed is bad and should IMHO not be done by provenpackagers.

Regards
Till
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux