On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:47:09 +0200 Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/26/2014 06:42 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Another idea that leaps to mind is to add more provenpackagers... > > have we set the bar too high so no one wants to apply? > > Debian has packages in collab-maint, where any Debian Developer can > make changes and upload them. In Debian, this is purely a social > convention because the project doesn't have ACLs for Debian > Developers, but there is a strong notion of package ownership despite > the lack of technical enforcement. > > Perhaps Fedora package maintainers could set a flag on their package > which would grant access to anyone who maintains any other package? > This way, package maintainers could gradually reduce the need for > provenpackager privileges (similar to what Debian did with the > introduction of the Debian Maintainer role, which is also governed by > package ACLs). I think this is overcomplex, IMHO. I think in general people who are granted provenpackager do a good job, and where they don't they can be educated and helped. Most any mistake can be corrected... kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct